Perfect guide for an Amature investor | One Up On Wall Street

One Up On Wall Street: How to Use What You Already Know to Make Money in the Market

About Author:

Peter Lynch (born January 19, 1944) is an American investor, mutual fund manager, and philanthropist. As the manager of the Magellan Fund at Fidelity Investments between 1977 and 1990, Lynch averaged a 29.2% annual return, consistently more than doubling the S&P 500 stock market index and making it the best-performing mutual fund in the world.[4][5] During his 13 year tenure, assets under management increased from $18 million to $14 billion.

Summary of Book:

Have you ever talked to someone, and when you mentioned that you're an investor in the stock market you've been asked this: "Aren't there plenty of professionals out there who dedicate their life's to earn money in the stock market?" "What makes you think that you can beat those guys at their own game?" I know many of my investor friend been asked this on multiple occasions. And It is an important topic: can the amateur investor earn money while there are so-called "professionals" in the same market? Could it even be so that the individual investor has the upper hand? This book the legendary investor Peter Lynch reveals how his amateur approach to investing has led him to become one of the most successful investors of all time. We will now observe five takeaways from his greatest findings.

Takeaway number 1: Why the individual investor can beat the pros:

Surely the amateur doesn't stand a chance against the might of Wall Street? Doesn't Wall Street have a ton of analysts from the fanciest Ivy League schools working 80 hours every week to find bargain stocks? Surely there can't be any left for the amateurs, right? According to Peter Lynch this assumption is dead wrong. In fact, the professional investor has many disadvantages compared to the amateur. Here are a few of them: Size. A successful money manager will naturally attract a lot of capital, and more capital means less opportunities. For instance, a $10 billion fund cannot invest in a company with a market cap of $10 million and expect the investment to have a meaningful impact on the fund's overall performance. Mediocrity is the safest play. There's a saying on Wall Street that "you'll never lose your job losing your clients money in an IBM" Meaning that, if you are just another sheep in the herd, you will get to keep your job. Remember that fund managers have their own agendas, and that they too are employees with jobs that aren't guaranteed. There's a lot of explaining. Fund managers tend to spend about 25% of their time explaining to various stakeholders about why they made certain decisions. Unfortunately, stocks aren't sympathetic enough to yield an extra 25% for this increased effort. Capital is dependent on clients. As a fund manager is investing other people's money, other people are also deciding how much money the manager has at disposal. The issue is that these other people aren't savvy investors themselves. They tend to pull back their money during bear markets and put in more of it during bulls, which is exactly the opposite of what one should do. This leaves the manager with the following dilemma: He has a lot of money to invest when everything is expensive and too little of it when everything is cheap. Does the individual investor have any of these disadvantages? NO! In fact, the amateur investor often has a great advantage over the professionals, which we'll discuss in the next takeaway.

Takeaway number 2: If you like the store, chances are you'll love the stock:

If you're a software engineer, a cashier at the local mall, a professional musician, a surfer, a fast-food addict or a crazy cat lady, you have an edge over Wall Street. Let me explain: We all have certain industries, products and services that we know more about than the average person does. Perhaps we know more about the fashion industry because we work at a local clothing store. Or perhaps we know more about the gaming industry because we consume games ourselves as our primary leisure activity. The point is that we all have valuable information about publicly listed companies through our everyday life, and this is information that Wall Street either doesn't know of yet, or had to spend hundreds of hours of market research to realize. Peter Lynch famously said that "if you like the store, chances are that you'll love the stock." Think about it! Which products do you enjoy and use from publicly listed companies? When you're looking for investment opportunities this way you must always remember to check how much the product or service that you enjoy affects the bottom line for the company. For example, sure, I'm an addict of the new Pepsi Lime flavour, I admit it. But let's say that this product only makes up 2% of the company's total profits. Then it doesn't really make sense for me to buy Pepsi based on me loving the Pepsi Lime.

Take away number 3: The 6 categories of stock investments:

All investment opportunities aren't created equal. To lump them all together and treat them accordingly would be a foolish and not so profitable a strategy. Peter Lynch argues that there are 6 different categories of stock investments.

(A)Slow growers: This Company is typically large and operates in a mature industry. The growth of the company is expected to be in the low single digits of percentages. If you invest in such a company, you typically do it for the dividends. Lynch doesn't like this category of stocks too much, as he thinks that if the company isn't going anywhere fast, neither will its stock price.

(B)Stalwarts: The stalwarts are the in-betweeners. They're not exactly the stock market's equivalent of cheetahs, but they are no snails either. An earnings growth rate of 10-12% per year is standard for this category. Under normal conditions you want to sell these companies off if they make a quick 30-50% gain.

(C)Fast growers: These are aggressive new enterprises, growing at 20% or more per year. They're often priced thereafter, but if you can conclude that a company is likely to be able to keep up the growth for several years, it can be a great investment. Always remember to verify your assumptions regarding the growth rate though. For instance - if Amazon can keep up its revenue growth rate of 30% per year for the next 10 years, its revenue will be equal to the GDP of France in 2029! Is this reasonable?

(D)Cyclicals: Cyclicals are companies whose revenues and profits rise and fall with the business cycle. Typically, they produce services and/or products that the consumers will postpone consumption of in times of financial uncertainty. An example is the automakers. People don't necessarily have to switch cars every 6 years or so, even if they prefer to. Timing is everything here. If you can identify early signs of a booming or busting cycle, you'll have the advantage.

(E)Turnarounds: The turnarounds are potential fatalities - companies with declining earnings and/or problematic balance sheets. If the company doesn't go down and instead manages to flourish once again, stock owners are rewarded thereafter. An interesting characteristic about the turnarounds, is that their ups and downs aren't as related to the market in general as the rest of the categories. A situation where a company has gotten a temporary bad reputation is usually a profitable turnaround case.

(F)Asset plays: Situations where the value of the company indicates that the market has missed out on something valuable that the company owns are asset plays. Such undervalued assets could be: real estate, patents, natural resources, or even company losses (as these are deductible from future earnings). Benjamin Graham was a strong advocate of this approach. He famously looked for companies where the values of the assets were higher than the market cap of the stock. Then he just waited, until the stock market realized its mistake and corrected it. The 6 categories are explained in much greater detail in the book. When using these categories one must understand that companies can belong to more than one of them at once. Also, companies don't stay in the same category forever. Take McDonald's for example. It's gone from being a fast grower, to a stalwart, to an asset play to slow grower.

Takeaway number 4: Ten traits of the Tenbagger:

A tenbagger is the expression that Peter Lynch uses to describe a stock which has appreciated to ten times your purchasing price. If you have a few of these you in you're investing lifetime, you'll become a legend. Different types of stocks must be treated differently, as stated in the previous takeaway, but there are also similarities. Here are 10 positive signs for a stock, regardless if it's an asset play or a fast grower.

1. The company name is dull, or even better, ridiculous. Such companies tend to be overlooked. The pros of Wall Street will think twice before bragging about their recent investment in "Maui Land and Pineapple Company Incorporated" It just sounds way too ridiculous!

2. It does something dull.

3. It does something disagreeable. Better yet, than doing something dull is to do something disagreeable. Swedish Match is a good example, which is the producer of the Swedish tobacco SNUS.

4. Institutions don't own it, and it's not followed by any analysts. Such companies haven't been discovered yet by the big boys, which gives them an extra potential upside.

5. There's something depressing about it. The burial company Service Cooperation International is a classic example.

6. The company's industry isn't growing. In the high-growth industries, thousands of people are constantly thinking about how they can grab a part of the market share. Stalling industries, on the other hand, aren't as prone to competition.

7. It has got a niche. These are the companies with moats that Warren Buffett is famously looking for.

8. It has reoccurring revenues. The product is a subscription or something that is consumed so that the customers are forced to return for more.

9. Insiders are buying. The insiders know more about the company than anyone else. When they are buying, you can be pretty sure that, at the very least, the company isn't going bankrupt soon.

10. The company is buying back shares. If a company has faith in itself, it should invest in itself. Peter Lynch prefers share buybacks for dividends.

Takeaway number 5: Five traits of the reversed Tenbagger:

And of course, there are also general don’ts that you don't want to see in any type of company that you are investing in.

1. It's in a hot industry. As previously mentioned, everyone is looking for ways to get into the hot industries. Competition is typically a bad omen for profits.

2. It's "the next" something. Beware when someone expresses that It's the next Amazon! The next Facebook! The next Google! or similar. Usually, it's not.

3. The company is diworseifying. Some call it diversification, but Lynch likes to refer to it as diworseification. If the company is acquiring other companies in unrelated industries, stay away!

4. It's dependent on a single customer. Some companies are relying on one customer for a significant share of profits. Usually, this is a weak bargaining position to be in, and the company can potentially be squeezed by this only customer.

5. It's a whisper stock. These are the long shots, often thought of as being on the brink of doing something miraculous, like curing every type of cancer, completely removing any addiction or creating world peace. One up on Wall Street recap: The individual investor can beat the pros at their own game because the game is rigged in the favour of the amateur. Use your consumption habits and your 9-5 to identify investing opportunities in companies where you have an edge over the rest of the investing community. All investment opportunities aren't created equal. You can usually categorize them into one or more of the following 6: slow growers, stalwarts, fast growers, cyclicals, turnarounds and/or asset plays. There are general positive traits of a stock, such as a dull business, reoccurring revenues and insider buying. And there are also general negative traits, such as diworseification and dependency on a single customer.